TerrySilverLoyal
Well-Known Member
I’m genuinely not being arsey but moving in there would it affect more fans views with regards to those massive flags that get waved?
The atmosphere is grim most games unfortunately.What the UBs want, the UBs get. Or the atmosphere suffers etc.
Rules state they would need to receive the full stand however I believe clubs can refuse and it would need discussed with the SFA.Not sure if this has been covered before, although I know I've asked the question, but what happens if we draw them* in the Cup? I'm assuming they'd have an increased allocation, would it be the 2,700 Euro section or the whole Broomie?
Funny though.poor response
Not sure if this has been covered before, although I know I've asked the question, but what happens if we draw them* in the Cup? I'm assuming they'd have an increased allocation, would it be the 2,700 Euro section or the whole Broomie?
Don’t think the increased allocation thing is a rule anymore? We certainly didn’t get a bigger allocation for Aberdeen due to safety concerns
@rangeral will know
But ultimately those who tick the cccs box would get ahead of those that don’t
@derbyloyal @Aww SkewNot sure if this has been covered before, although I know I've asked the question, but what happens if we draw them* in the Cup? I'm assuming they'd have an increased allocation, would it be the 2,700 Euro section or the whole Broomie?
Sheep gave us league allocation a fee years ago even though by rules we were due more . Police recommendation on safety apparently.I think both clubs can still agree on this shitty wee reduced number, sadly.
Not sure if this has been covered before, although I know I've asked the question, but what happens if we draw them* in the Cup? I'm assuming they'd have an increased allocation, would it be the 2,700 Euro section or the whole Broomie?
You obviously weren't at QOS cup game.It will impact on you unless you're front few rows. With flags for 90 you will now be as good as a restricted view seat.I’m in BF4 and have supported it primarily because it won’t impact on me!
Anyone needing to move should be given a good choice of options if possible!
Accessibility needs and sitting next to family need to be catered for.
If you were in sections either side for QOS game you may be surprised. Constant flag waving for 90 minutes meant you couldn’t see large parts of game. If you were a kid forget it. If you pay to be in that section it is what it is. But most don't pay a ST to have a flag obstructing their view. My ST seat that night was a restricted view seat.
Sheep gave us league allocation a fee years ago even though by rules we were due more . Police recommendation on safety apparently.
With safe standing.Relocate them to the Copland Front
I put down for it not willing to move(BF4 wouldn't need to). But put a big bit about the QOS game in comments. As I said a kid won't see anything with the flags. If they came to an agreement with them before maybe 5 into game then 5 at end wouldn't be an issue. Personally I think 90 minutes of it when it is affecting people not in that section is not on.Fair dos, positive feedback probably won't be unanimous, but I'd imagine the majority would be for it.
5 A lot of people see BF as the place to be since UB moved over, I don't see the survey being met with much of a backlash overall.
Remains to be seen I suppose
Shouldn’t have broken the spiv boycott.Amazed amount saying a seat is a seat. Some have had their seat in the family for generations. Not saying that will be the case in BF just surprised people think moving those against their will is acceptable.
It's a positive move, however would have liked to see them in corner where away fans currently are and relocate away fans toI’m genuinely not being arsey but moving in there would it affect more fans views with regards to those massive flags that getToo small would not look as good as a central positionAway corner would be better, more prominent and flag waiving wouldn't block views
Wouldn’t be so sure mate. Im BF4 and said no but that id move if seats made available. Not one person in the BF4 WhatsApp hasn’t said no.Personally I think it’ll only be opposition from current BF3 ST holders that would scupper it. What % that would need to be is anyones guess
It’s all well and good having a majority of BF1/2/4/5 supporting it as people in those sections wouldn’t need to be moved unless they wanted to join the central singing section, if there’s enough resistance in BF3 then the club would have a difficult decision to make
That said, I honestly can’t foresee a huge amount of resistance
They can although I believe Celtic would push for a bigger allocation more than we would.I think both clubs can still agree on this shitty wee reduced number, sadly.
It’s not their seat though is it you’re renting it for the duration of the season.Amazed amount saying a seat is a seat. Some have had their seat in the family for generations. Not saying that will be the case in BF just surprised people think moving those against their will is acceptable.
The flag waving is a massive issue for those saying know who sit in bf4 or 2. If there was a guarantee that the flags would be scrapped then it would have more supportAway corner would be better, more prominent and flag waiving wouldn't block views
Move them to the middle of Copland front would be ideal.Email issued to BF season ticket holders.
Mainly because it doesn’t impact them personally. Be different if it did I’d imagine.Amazed amount saying a seat is a seat. Some have had their seat in the family for generations. Not saying that will be the case in BF just surprised people think moving those against their will is acceptable.
The rule does exist, it's applicable in the Scottish Cup and it's up to 20% of the tickets.Don’t think the increased allocation thing is a rule anymore? We certainly didn’t get a bigger allocation for Aberdeen due to safety concerns
@rangeral will know
But ultimately those who tick the cccs box would get ahead of those that don’t
There’s no rule that says we have to give anyone a “full stand”.Rules state they would need to receive the full stand however I believe clubs can refuse and it would need discussed with the SFA.
bingoMove them to the middle of Copland front would be ideal.
Never seen any other club in Europe where their “ultras” are in the same stand as the away fans.
The thing is, having the survey ensures people have their say which is a positive step forward. I believe the majority of people I know will be for it but I’m aware there’ll be people like yourself against itWouldn’t be so sure mate. Im BF4 and said no but that id move if seats made available. Not one person in the BF4 WhatsApp hasn’t said no.
That’s what to put on the form mate. Perfect. Your boy will love itI’m BF3 and will happily stay there in the singing section with my boy
Absolutely mate. Transparency will be key.The thing is, having the survey ensures people have their say which is a positive step forward. I believe the majority of people I know will be for it but I’m aware there’ll be people like yourself against it
Hopefully all BF ST holders answer the survey so the data is as factual as possible
They can although I believe Celtic would push for a bigger allocation more than we would.
Just shift them the same way celtic did, 20% discount on a ST renewal elsewhere in the stadium to those effected.Personally I think it’ll only be opposition from current BF3 ST holders that would scupper it. What % that would need to be is anyones guess
It’s all well and good having a majority of BF1/2/4/5 supporting it as people in those sections wouldn’t need to be moved unless they wanted to join the central singing section, if there’s enough resistance in BF3 then the club would have a difficult decision to make
That said, I honestly can’t foresee a huge amount of resistance
20% of the stadium's capacity would be the full Broomloan Stand which is the rule.There’s no rule that says we have to give anyone a “full stand”.
Agreed, Call me cynical but i seen this survey and immediately thought of the impending AGM.Hopefully these results are the basis for actual movement, rather than just to appear as though the club are actually interested.