BBC’s response to Michael Stewart and employee’s tweets on Rangers kit launch

[a_weir]

Who was the other journo complained about that had if upheld? English?

I get where they’re coming from to an extent re: Stewart because if he’s not an employee he can’t be punished.

However like others have said, perhaps they will reconsider contracting his services in future.

 

[eeboh]

We can also assure you that BBC is not biased for or against any football club.

Aye ok then

Something else aren't they, thousands upon thousands of us just imagine it... haahhaahaaaahaaa

 

[CampsieStar]

Do we start submitting complaints during sportscene then, when he is undoubtedly employed by them?

Great point, perhaps a good way to bypass their archaic and unfit for purpose complaint process.

 

[Optimus_Prime]

Even if the failed trialist is not an employee, he’s on the same platform of those who are, and there is no distinction to be made during air time.

Not only that, they are paying this loser with public money where the close associationm with him further tarnishes their brand.

So as a non employee, it should be obvious and easy to bin him. But no, they would rather say he’s not an employee and the hamster wheel continues to spin.