Hang on, just because I was against how you went about trying to inflict change doesn't mean I was their chief supporters, I think you'll find I always agreed that they were failing to grow the membership and a change was required but I always thought that actions like the special resolutions should only have been used where financial irregularities have been discovered, things like failing to grow the membership or failing to hold a members meeting, during COVID, for me were issues that could be addressed when electing members. Remember how you first went about trying to inflict change before you got a decent team behind you like
@LJ50 . I think sometimes you like to forget that.
Also I couldn't shake off the feeling that your were doing Park Jnr & cos bidding to scupper their deal with King. The attacks on c1872 seemed to go hand in hand with the attacks on King. Funny that eh. Jesus Christ Dave King was one of my favourite thread titles from back then
I think I've always stated that it wasn't fair to pile into the organisation when it was only two people most posters had an issue with, when they could be removed via voting. All the piling in was going to do was put people off putting themselves forward for election and that's exactly what has happened.
Are you at it, how can you be voted on when we had 300 Members give me their names and wanted a vote of no confidence in the Board, and their reply was to bar us from the organization
I have said hello to Park Junior once and have never met Park senior
Why did Dave King pay Chris Graham via Rangers to control Club1872
And why did Dave King offer us 2 seats on the Club i872 Board on the condition we signed NDA's if he wasn't controlling them?
He also refused my request to have a meeting with Laura as she was too ' emotional '
Also told me if our group agreed, the two females would step down at Christmas
I was going to vote against the amalgamation of RST and RF, when someone from the Club told me that Dave wanted it, out of the respect I had for him at that time I agreed not to publicly go against it
,A decision I would not make again
RF and RST have been shafted with this, I'm getting pissed off with people like you and if anyone is up for it I would join them in helping get a new CIC off the ground with certain conditions
Once it was up and running we would be barred from standing for a director role in it,
We would have an open Election, people needing two sponsors
We would want a working relationship with the Board
We would never ask for a place on the Board
There would be no talk of Blazer chasing
No expense other than money spent on Admin
No financial reward
No seats in The directors Box via Club 1872
Meetings every three months minuted and released to members within seven days
Everything would be transparent
We would ask the Club for regular face-to-face meetings
And One member one vote for everything, and numbers released instead of % vote
And anything else that made it open and Transparent