Agreed - disappointed he's chosen that c.unt Broon as the example.I really like Thomson as he usually speaks sense, but what good does he expect to come from that soundbite? He has a range of leaders he's played with to choose from.
Whats Thomson talking about, Has he forgot about Jack, McCrorie and Rossiter.
Why the hell have so many of these Rangers stories got the ugly mug of Brown all over them ffs?
Thank you once again Mr Dingwall.
I dont think he means we need a Scott Brown as a technical player - Thomson is well aware that hes shite.
Guessing he meant that we need an on field leader (which we do) and the paps took it in themselves to spin it in favour of their man crush
That's exactly what Thomson meant and that's exactly what the journos have done - because they know how obsessed our supporters are with Brown. They'll be reading this thread high fiving each other.
He talks about him too much, pal or not, poor bugger.I really like Thomson as he usually speaks sense, but what good does he expect to come from that soundbite? He has a range of leaders he's played with to choose from.
Or Bazza, he played with him.Agreed - he could have used Souness, Hurlock, McCall or even himself as an example.
Although too many in our own support build Lego up as well. We can barely get through a thread on here without mentioning him.
I really like Thomson as he usually speaks sense, but what good does he expect to come from that soundbite? He has a range of leaders he's played with to choose from.
I don't think he was ever on the radar for the managers job.Jock Wallace resigned on May 24th and John Greig was appointed 24 hours later so I wonder where the window was that Rangers approached Ally MacLeod?
Jock Wallace resigned on May 24th and John Greig was appointed 24 hours later so I wonder where the window was that Rangers approached Ally MacLeod?
They will only learn when the papers stop paying them.FFS, when will our ex players learn?