GillespiesLeftBoot
Well-Known Member
If he grows a beard; bring him back.
Think there's a lot of similarities between him and Dowell tbh.Probably not going to happen for him at Rangers.
On a different planet from Lawrence and Dowell though.
Think there's a lot of similarities between him and Dowell tbh.
0 pace, 0 athleticism, poor on the ball.
I don't see at all what folk think Hagi offers.
I disagree completely.0 pace and athleticism yes but he’s technically very good, he’s not poor on the ball.
I disagree completely.
Find his supposed technical ability massively overrated.
He gives it away as much as he doesn't and he tries to be creative with outlandish moves/passes that fans from the stands can see aren't on.
And now he's in a much more open league, a league that suits him, and he again can't get game time.
That's my point though, his inability to spot when to be creative just results in us losing posession.He at least tries to be creative and make things happen. Give me that everyday over someone that’ll play sideways or safe.
He’s playing in a much better league at the moment.
This is our issue. Players like Hagi aren’t good enough for Rangers whether he is better = to what we have currently.Can he be any worse than what we have?
That's my point though, his inability to spot when to be creative just results in us losing posession.
He is, but in a league that suits what he needs as a player and he can't get off the bench. He can't be that good if he can't even get off the bench for a relegation fighting La Liga team
yeah but we do own him, so that does change things.If he hadn't played for us previously nobody on this board would give the guy 1 second of attention. Not what we need at all.
He at least tries to be creative and make things happen. Give me that everyday over someone that’ll play sideways or safe.
He’s playing in a much better league at the moment.
I could try and be creative but like Hagi I ain’t good enough.
As for playing in a better league, he is in a better league but he ain’t playing as he is on the bench more often than not .
We are, so no sense in having someone in the team giving it away even more.We are absolutely pathetic at keeping the ball just now anyway and have been since Steve Davis stopped playing.
There’s a big difference between being a creative player in a team with most of the ball creating the most chances against low blocks than a team figuring for relegation. I know what type of football would suit Ianis hagi more.
He was more of a second striker for alaves in games I seen chasing balls in the channel, not his game.
He’s proved he can do it here when he got the most assist in the league and most were from open play.
I’d much rather him next season than wright mccausland and id now add tom Lawrence to that list
We are, so no sense in having someone in the team giving it away even more.
Surely the openness of La Liga would suit him far more with space in behind for a supposedly creative player to pick out passes?
So in his natural position, supposedly, behind the striker? Chasing balls may not 'be his game' but that's exactly why he always got dropped against the tims, for example. Need to the hard work and produce.
The 55 season was 3 years ago. Kent had his best season 3 years ago but not a single person wants him back.
How about we get rid of all of them? None of the names youve mentioned are anywhere near good enough either.
Wright or Hagi?If he didn’t have the name hagi we wouldn’t even be talking about him. Another one nowhere near what we require. Seems to get better the longer he’s away like most players we have.
We need far more than that. The squad's needing gutted.He’s not playing for a top team in La Liga he’s playing for relegation strugglers who don’t get as much of the ball and playing on the counter.
I’d also drop him against them but there are games where his skill set is needed for example. Motherwell home where we dropped points and the two wide options were mccausland and sterling, hagi has more creative ability than both with his weak foot.
Speak for yourself btw id have loved Ryan Kent’s name on the team sheet last weekend where Scott wright was playing.
If the money is right he might be off in the summer but there would be worse things happening than him staying.
We’re gonna need two centre half’s, a left back (maybe two) a number 6, a striker and possibly two wingers in the summer btw
Every single one of they players I wouldn’t have I’d move all them on. If you think hagi is the answer, that’s a problem. We need better is my point, bringing a player back who’s marginally better than the shite that’s here currently won’t make a difference and win titles.Wright or Hagi?
Silva or Hagi?
Dowell or Hagi?
Raskin or Hagi?
Dessers or Hagi?
Dessers or a dustbin?
We will probably get more than what we spent on Hagi even if he doesn't get a game at the Euros(which he probably won't) because of his name at the fact that Galatasaray will more than likely want him. They will not be taking him for his playing ability but again for the name, as they know a Galatasaray top with no.10 Hagi on the back will sell like wildfire.If he does well at the Euros hopefully a few clubs will come for him.
Always liked Hagi but seems he doesn’t see his future at Rangers and the feeling is mutual at Ibrox.
The mindset of modern Rangers supporters is nothing short of mental.He’s not playing for a top team in La Liga he’s playing for relegation strugglers who don’t get as much of the ball and playing on the counter.
I’d also drop him against them but there are games where his skill set is needed for example. Motherwell home where we dropped points and the two wide options were mccausland and sterling, hagi has more creative ability than both with his weak foot.
Speak for yourself btw id have loved Ryan Kent’s name on the team sheet last weekend where Scott wright was playing.
If the money is right he might be off in the summer but there would be worse things happening than him staying.
We’re gonna need two centre half’s, a left back (maybe two) a number 6, a striker and possibly two wingers in the summer btw
The mindset of modern Rangers supporters is nothing short of mental.
Bring in a player who we'll drop against Celtic but play against Motherwell at home.
How the last decade has destroyed the standards and aspirations of our support.
Believe me m8 if we concentrate on havingIt’s no bringing him in he’s ours and because certain games need certain players.
Nothing to do with standards or aspirations.
How many old firms did Boyd not play because we needed legs?
He isn’t poor on the ball he is slower than treacle mind you but he’s a skillful lad wouldn’t do any worse than Tom LawrenceThink there's a lot of similarities between him and Dowell tbh.
0 pace, 0 athleticism, poor on the ball.
I don't see at all what folk think Hagi offers.
I disagree. I find his technical ability to be vastly overrated.He isn’t poor on the ball he is slower than treacle mind you but he’s a skillful lad wouldn’t do any worse than Tom Lawrence
Believe me m8 if we concentrate on having
players who can play against Celtic, they'll be capable of dealing with Motherwell at Ibrox.
LOL, it's you who wants players to play Motherwell and others to play Celtic.We’ve not got the luxury of signing 9 starters this summer
HagiWright or Hagi?
Silva or Hagi?
Dowell or Hagi?
Raskin or Hagi?
Dessers or Hagi?
Dessers or a dustbin?
Correct- IMO not what we need going forward and I’d be surprised if Clement see’s Hagi as a starter next seasonHe’s a good lad, has a great attitude and is undoubtedly better than some of the imposters we’ve brought in.
None of that makes him the answer. He should be moved on.
Lawrence is a better player than Hagi. Both miles away from being good enough.Can’t be any worse than Lawrence. Has an eye for a pass to open a packed defence and is capable of shooting on site with both feet.
Let’s see what Clement thinks of him when he returns. I like Hagi. But I wouldn’t be too upset if he leaves.