That's only the ones they're admitting to.. While marking their own homework!!
When was the last time a game changing decisions went against C****c ?
And we all know the,reaction if it did !!
Well, I'd argue that the penalty that went against them at Tynecastle, just before half time at 0-0, in a game they went on to lose 2-0 would probably qualify
It's funny, the Kilmarnock one we still came back from and won the game. That's probably the most "impactful" in terms of the game situation
The Sterling red card a close 2nd as it's only 2-1 at the time and puts us under the cosh for 8 minutes of injury time. But again, we manage to see the game out
The one at Parkhead comes with an asterix, because if things had been done properly we'd still not have received the penalty I suspect. Right conclusion, wrong process is probably the fair description
So that leaves us with Cifuentes against Dundee, which whilst inconvenient wasn't a massive issue at the time, and the Kilmarnock penalty against Souttar at Ibrox.
So 4 of the 5 mistakes we've been on the hard done by end of, are in games that we've ultimately won anyway (not that it justifies them, it just suggests that the "cheating" isn't very good)
But then, I see we're doing that FF thing... we take the IRP as gospel for the Sterling red card against Aberdeen, whilst still arguing that Roofe's goal in the September Old Firm should have stood despite the fact that the IRP didn't deem that an incorrect decision...
All in all, it just goes to show the narrative on here that Celtic are on the receiving end of the benefit of VAR is pretty far from the truth. It gives an element of credence to the concerns that we seem to be disproportionately on the wrong end of decisions - but strangely only in games we win