Albion Rovers Director

Might be a good thing if some clubs fold. Too many clubs in our small tin pot country.

Unless you're a supporter of one of these teams mate.

There's people out there who have the same affection for Montrose, Peterhead, QOS etc as we do for Rangers.

And how did they by and large feel when we were under that threat?

Fuck them all.
 
Fans won't change clubs. They'll walk away from football.

There isnt too many clubs at all. We have a population that doesnt value it's football culture and that no longer values football as something to experience in person. The couple of hundred fans who follow Albion Rovers are no less important and deserve no less sympathy than the thousands who follow the old firm.

There are about 12 clubs in the greater Glasgow area. It's diluted the quality of teams in our league and lets more people play at a higher level than they should be playing it in the top flight leagues. And that's before factoring in the further saturation of resources when you include the juniors.
 
Unless you're a supporter of one of these teams mate.

There's people out there who have the same affection for Montrose, Peterhead, QOS etc as we do for Rangers.
This.

I was always of the view that we should do away with a number of clubs in Scotland. Merge them. Close them. Whatever. Until I nearly lose my club. Now, my opinion is very different. We need to restructure the leagues, but it’s up to the clubs to decide if they continue in that new structure.
 
There are about 12 clubs in the greater Glasgow area. It's diluted the quality of teams in our league and lets more people play at a higher level than they should be playing it in the top flight leagues. And that's before factoring in the further saturation of resources when you include the juniors.

No it hasnt.

Queens Park don't dilute the quality of Thistle. Thistle don't dilute the quality of Rangers.

Serious question - if Rangers had folded for good, would you have found another Scottish team to follow or would you have walked away from football completely?

Rangers and Celtic do not deserve better than Albion Rovers or Forfar.
 
Just been interviewed on Sky, legitimately concerned about having to pay wages etc, with no income for the foreseeable future.

When asked about how this season should be decided, he said that due to players/coaches etc having planned holidays and being out of contract, there is no way in his opinion that the season can be extended and he can see no solution other than the season being declared null and void.

Traffic chaos already reported in Coatbridge, as double-glazing suppliers head to his home looking for his business.
He's right there's nothing that can be done imo other than voiding it all. It's small clubs like them I feel sorry for as well.
 
No it hasnt.

Queens Park don't dilute the quality of Thistle. Thistle don't dilute the quality of Rangers.

Serious question - if Rangers had folded for good, would you have found another Scottish team to follow or would you have walked away from football completely?

Rangers and Celtic do not deserve better than Albion Rovers or Forfar.

We would have had the resources and support to start them back up again. It's a pointless hypothetical question but even so, Rangers would be able to form a phoenix club precisely because we're better supported than those teams. Forfar is a terrible example as well when there's 4 top flight teams for about 40,000 people in that region. If other leagues worldwide had a similar number of teams per population, would they not be in the hundreds or not far off it?
 
I go to q
Unless you're a supporter of one of these teams mate.

There's people out there who have the same affection for Montrose, Peterhead, QOS etc as we do for Rangers.

I go to quite a few Stenhousemuir games and they are a great wee community club. They have one of the biggest budgets in league 2 but this is going to hurt them. Hope I am wrong though
 
No it hasnt.

Queens Park don't dilute the quality of Thistle. Thistle don't dilute the quality of Rangers.

Serious question - if Rangers had folded for good, would you have found another Scottish team to follow or would you have walked away from football completely?

Rangers and Celtic do not deserve better than Albion Rovers or Forfar.
Too many small teams dilutes the quality, which affects attendance, sponsorship, revenue...

Put Rangers in a British league. What would attendance be like if we had a bigger stadium?
 
I have a niggling feeling the SFA will give Celtic the title and increase the league to 16 teams to get round the Dundee United / Hearts problem. Wouldn’t put anything past them
 
People jobs and livelihoods, years of tradition. Have a heart mate.
It’s a perfectly fair point though and these clubs won’t go willingly. As long as you’ve got the Alloa chairman second in charge of Scottish football you can’t expect them to do what’s right or sensible. Our football is part time from half way down the Championship. There is literally no need for these teams to play in a PROFESSIONAL league structure.
 
Too many small teams dilutes the quality, which affects attendance, sponsorship, revenue...

Put Rangers in a British league. What would attendance be like if we had a bigger stadium?

Not a comparable scenario.

Rangers and Celtic draw more fans than the rest of Scottish football combined. It's massively skewed. The number of clubs doesnt matter - could be a single league of 12 or the current set up of 42. Fans support who they support and if 30 Scottish clubs closed then those fans wouldn't suddenly start following one of the remaining 12.

Rangers move south? There's every chance that the club could flourish. It's equally possible that Rangers would become an also ran like Newcastle, Everton or Aston Villa. The determining factors would be TV money, sponsorship money and international marketing. The number of teams wouldn't matter a jot.

The number of teams playing in Scotland does not affect the quality of football. What affects the quality of football is the quality of player. That isnt going to suddenly improve by having less teams and fewer people following Scottish football clubs.
 
It’s a perfectly fair point though and these clubs won’t go willingly. As long as you’ve got the Alloa chairman second in charge of Scottish football you can’t expect them to do what’s right or sensible. Our football is part time from half way down the Championship. There is literally no need for these teams to play in a PROFESSIONAL league structure.

Why is there no need for them to be part of the professional league structure?

Just because the majority of Scottish clubs are part time, doesnt mean that they shouldn't remain professional.
 
We would have had the resources and support to start them back up again. It's a pointless hypothetical question but even so, Rangers would be able to form a phoenix club precisely because we're better supported than those teams. Forfar is a terrible example as well when there's 4 top flight teams for about 40,000 people in that region. If other leagues worldwide had a similar number of teams per population, would they not be in the hundreds or not far off it?

Would a phoenix club have been given access to Scottish football? Would it have been expected to start in the lowland league?

The OF support skews Scottish football. It isnt healthy for so many people to follow 2 clubs. Scottish football can't do anything about that. People support who they support. Overall not enough people in Scotland attend games on a regular basis. Thats the real issue. We need more people to start following their local football team.
 
I have a niggling feeling the SFA will give Celtic the title and increase the league to 16 teams to get round the Dundee United / Hearts problem. Wouldn’t put anything past them
Absolutely, they will try and do everything in their power to give them the title.
 
Why is there no need for them to be part of the professional league structure?

Just because the majority of Scottish clubs are part time, doesnt mean that they shouldn't remain professional.
Why shouldn’t they? Because the tail should never wag the dug.
They aren’t professional, you can’t be a part time professional can you? These players are professional plumbers who play football twice a week in the evenings with a game at the weekend.
There’s clubs in the Juniors who get more crowd that 30% of our ‘Proffesional’ teams and their players are earning considerably more.

Why don’t you go and ask the English FA why they haven’t got someone from League 2 as second in commaand of their footballing board? Or ask the Spanish league why the Chairman of Tenerife FC isn’t dictating to Barca and Real how the game should be run?

Seems to me like the answer to why is the Chairman of Alloa the vice chairman of the SFA is pretty damn obvious
 
Bottom line is that this is time for league reconstruction. Historically the other SPFL clubs voted against this but in more recent times most other Top Tier teams (other than now St Johnstone) only give the Old Firm one part of the ground and we often have empty stands as we play these teams. Not quite sure of all the options but instead of playing each other 4 times we could increase from 12 to 16 teams and just play home and away. Call the current league campaign null and void but keep the current 12 and add 4. Removes the complications over relegation, play offs and promotion. Only team that wouldn't like it would be....
 
Bottom line is that this is time for league reconstruction. Historically the other SPFL clubs voted against this but in more recent times most other Top Tier teams (other than now St Johnstone) only give the Old Firm one part of the ground and we often have empty stands as we play these teams. Not quite sure of all the options but instead of playing each other 4 times we could increase from 12 to 16 teams and just play home and away. Call the current league campaign null and void but keep the current 12 and add 4. Removes the complications over relegation, play offs and promotion. Only team that wouldn't like it would be....
18 teams with everyone playing each other twice Otherwise there’s nowhere near enough games, even with 18 that’s 4 less games than now
 
Would a phoenix club have been given access to Scottish football? Would it have been expected to start in the lowland league?

The OF support skews Scottish football. It isnt healthy for so many people to follow 2 clubs. Scottish football can't do anything about that. People support who they support. Overall not enough people in Scotland attend games on a regular basis. Thats the real issue. We need more people to start following their local football team.
Rangers and Celtic are the local team to over a million people. The likes of the fife teams are probably exceeding realistic attendances as it is, the idea they could find more is unrealistic
 
Why shouldn’t they? Because the tail should never wag the dug.
They aren’t professional, you can’t be a part time professional can you? These players are professional plumbers who play football twice a week in the evenings with a game at the weekend.
There’s clubs in the Juniors who get more crowd that 30% of our ‘Proffesional’ teams and their players are earning considerably more.

Why don’t you go and ask the English FA why they haven’t got someone from League 2 as second in commaand of their footballing board? Or ask the Spanish league why the Chairman of Tenerife FC isn’t dictating to Barca and Real how the game should be run?

Seems to me like the answer to why is the Chairman of Alloa the vice chairman of the SFA is pretty damn obvious

Yes you can.
 
Rangers and Celtic are the local team to over a million people. The likes of the fife teams are probably exceeding realistic attendances as it is, the idea they could find more is unrealistic

No they're not.

They're local to the residents of Glasgow. Thats it.
 
Yes you can.
What does your pal do for a living?
He’s a professional footballer but he’s just nipping off to do 8 hours on a building site before he does an hours ‘professional, training tonight. Then it’s four more shifts and on the building site until he plays his next ‘professional‘ game

Aye mate, very good
 
18 teams with everyone playing each other twice Otherwise there’s nowhere near enough games, even with 18 that’s 4 less games than now
Don't have a problem with that. Also don't have a problem with less games...we should assume we will have a Europa run and not get into chaos due to succes.
 
Don't have a problem with that. Also don't have a problem with less games...we should assume we will have a Europa run and not get into chaos due to succes.
I agree less games wouldnt be a bad thing overall but without 8 old firm games a year I can’t see how teams could sustain that AND 4 less games total.
 
There are a fair few clubs in Scotland who operate very much on a month to month basis and have no cash reserves to survive having to pay wages without ticket revenue.

Many of them will also take advantage of the summer months to operate with a reduced squad to save cash and bring players in closer to the season starting. Asking them to extend contracts for a month or so is even more financial strain.
 
Might be a good thing if some clubs fold. Too many clubs in our small tin pot country.


I've often felt the real solution in scottish football was to reduce the number of clubs, those folding could find themselves being amalgamated with local rivals to form stronger clubs over-all. would rather there be say... 18-22 stronger clubs dotted around the country than what we have
 
Europe qualifiers ?

Play Off Teams ?

They’d be getting into very dangerous territory if you consider every scottish league.
Which is why there will need to be a European wide decision. There can't be shitty little countries wanting to do their own thing.
Null and void thus allowing all clubs in all countries to be ready to move when needed in unison.
 
What does your pal do for a living?
He’s a professional footballer but he’s just nipping off to do 8 hours on a building site before he does an hours ‘professional, training tonight. Then it’s four more shifts and on the building site until he plays his next ‘professional‘ game

Aye mate, very good

If they get paid a wage for playing football under a contract of employment then they're professional.
 
Should consider dishing out the prize money to keep clubs afloat. Impact on cashflow of small clubs with no season ticket revenue will be catastrophic.
 
I've often felt the real solution in scottish football was to reduce the number of clubs, those folding could find themselves being amalgamated with local rivals to form stronger clubs over-all. would rather there be say... 18-22 stronger clubs dotted around the country than what we have

They wouldn't be stronger. You'd end up with more clubs like Caley Thistle - hated in their areas by people who used to support the separate teams. Football fans don't follow merged clubs. They walk away from football completely.
 
Which is why there will need to be a European wide decision. There can't be shitty little countries wanting to do their own thing.
Null and void thus allowing all clubs in all countries to be ready to move when needed in unison.

That’s where my mind is too mate;)
 
Back
Top