Unibet with the dots but not the horrible Zero % Mission part.
Why can’t we have it without that part?
There’s probably others out there without it.
Why can’t we have it without that part?
There’s probably others out there without it.
I’m sure the Zero % is a UK only initiativeUnibet with the dots but not the horrible Zero % Mission part.
Why can’t we have it without that part?
There’s probably others out there without it.
Unibet with the dots but not the horrible Zero % Mission part.
Why can’t we have it without that part?
There’s probably others out there without it.
It’s definitely a UK only initiative by Kindred GroupIs it not because gambling companies have to be shown to be promoting not gambling as much, in the UK?
Gambling companies going to get banned so makes sense that Doncaster signs a multi year sponsorship with William Hill.Unfortunately stuck with it until another company offer a better deal or gambling sponsors get banned.
It's classic Doncaster.Gambling companies going to get banned so makes sense that Doncaster signs a multi year sponsorship with William Hill.
It's classic Doncaster.
C r smithIt would be good to have a sponsor which isn’t either alcohol or gambling related but realistically who else would be interested ?
What a potentially lose out on sponsorship money? Aye that will show them.Bisgrove should have had the balls to tell them to stick it.
It looks awful on our jersey and there is absolutely no need for it.
I'm talking specifically about the zero mission shite.What a potentially lose out on sponsorship money? Aye that will show them.
Have you seen our average supporter? The only other option is Greggs.It would be good to have a sponsor which isn’t either alcohol or gambling related but realistically who else would be interested ?
Playing in Scotland, Rangers need to maximise every sponsorship avenue they can - telling companies to “stick it” because of their own branding is suicidal.I'm talking specifically about the zero mission shite.
It's not essential and makes the logo look cheap and tacky.
Rangers could just say, we'll use your logo but we don't want the zero mission nonsense.
I'm talking specifically about the zero mission shite.
It's not essential and makes the logo look cheap and tacky.
Rangers could just say, we'll use your logo but we don't want the zero mission nonsense.
The precedent has been set though with the likes of Brugge and Copenhagen not having that shitshpw on their short.Playing in Scotland, Rangers need to maximise every sponsorship avenue they can - telling companies to “stick it” because of their own branding is suicidal.
It's not a requirement.It will be a legislative requirement that gambling companies have to undertake as part of sports sponsorship. The alternative would be to find another sponsor.
It's not a requirement.
Show me a gambling sponsor in UK football that has this nonsense.
Christ, the mentally challengeds have a betting company but there is no strap line pish.
You don't believe that surely? We'll be proactive to tackle gambling addiction by....promoting a gambling company.Good point which I hadn't considered.
Maybe it is just a question of some organisations being a bit more proactive to take responsibility on the subject of 'problem' gambling issues.
You don't believe that surely? We'll be proactive to tackle gambling addiction by....promoting a gambling company.
Nobody is saying it is unlawful I don't think.There are many vices in life that are harmful and people will find addictions in many different ways. That doesn't mean that alcohol, gambling, sugar etc is unlawful but that the organisations in those industries look for ethical ways to reduce the likelihood of addiction.
Whilst I don't personally believe there is merit in some of these restrictions or approaches, it should not preclude organisations from operating or for other organisations to promote their services through sponsorship. If there is a more ethical way of doing business then perhaps we (as a club) prefer that more than others.
Nobody is saying it is unlawful I don't think.
I just can't believe that anyone would think that our sponsorship deal with a gambling company is borne out of our ethics and a concern to stop gambling addictions. That's a ludicrous take if serious. Our sponsorship deal is rightly about £££. To try and paint it as some sort of ethical mission is quite funny to be honest.
It's probably only a dozen goes through the washing machine away from ours being the same logo.Unibet with the dots but not the horrible Zero % Mission part.
Why can’t we have it without that part?
There’s probably others out there without it.
Be careful what you wish for. With the current profile of Scottish football as it is the next sponsor will probably be something like Nambarrie Tea.Can't wait until we get rid of this shitty Kindred Group.
Be careful what you wish for. With the current profile of Scottish football as it is the next sponsor will probably be something like Nambarrie Tea.
Yaaaaaassss!!Looks ok with the hint of orange on the white