Bayheadloyal
Well-Known Member
Im off to check the odds on Bruno Fernandes yellow card first match now
Not the subs should go back to 3I like this, some of the recent rule changes have been good like extra stoppage time & more subs...Bring on harsher timewasting rules as well
I go to a lot of junior games and I can't understand why anyone would be a referee. If it's stopped at the top level it would be easier to stop at the lower levels.I would agree with your thoughts on young referees at a lower level but I don't think players at that level take anything from professionals above them.
A fair bit of abuse to younger refs comes from the spectators.They should be protected from that.
You're way out with the VAR concept as most protests are done before VAR steps in. You rarely,if ever,see players protest a VAR decision.Nah, they're making it easy on refs after players have gone beyond the levels of what is acceptable.
I'm in full agreement with this rule change. There's no need for 10 players surrounding a ref when a decision has been made...even less so when VAR is now reviewing things too.
The game being broken up by timewasting like surrounding refs and spending time on the deck is a huge issue. The less players get away with having gamed it for years the better.
DefinitelyNot the subs should go back to 3
This is not a bad idea in itself in trying to clamp down on the sheer cheating by pressure and abuse that refs get
There have been a number of managers who’ve fined their own players if they were booked for dissent.Pretty sure Brian Clough instructed his players to never pull up a ref or argue with any of his decisions.
I might be talking pish.
Absolutely nothing negative about this rule.Another nonsense. They are trying to make a simple game very hard.
More pressure on referees.
lets not derail the thread but I've no doubt it would be applied discretionally up here depending on the shirt colourI actually like it.
If it was aplied in ascotland the mentally challengeds would have 10 players booked every throw in that goeas against them
No it's not. Look at almost every team against us. Always 3 or 4 players in his ear after a tackle wanting a booking or red card.Another nonsense. They are trying to make a simple game very hard.
More pressure on referees.
And there you have it.No it's not. Look at almost every team against us. Always 3 or 4 players in his ear after a tackle wanting a booking or red card.
About time that became an automatic booking - exceptions for celtc no doubt
And there you have it.Absolutely nothing negative about this rule.
As for it being more pressure on the referee, I’d suggest it’s the opposite.
Not only will it reduce the amount of players in their face, it’ll be easy to simply booked those who are without fear of criticism.
Of course, except from Celtic.
My only demand here is that it’s every player, every time and not, as happens with over celebrating goals, only the scorer who gets the booking.
You're way out with the VAR concept as most protests are done before VAR steps in. You rarely,if ever,see players protest a VAR decision.
That's left to the supporters groups like this.
That’s nasty…..So Harry Kane will be speaking up for his team mates.
Works in rugbyAnother nonsense. They are trying to make a simple game very hard.
More pressure on referees.
That's always been the norm though.Works in rugby
The norm isn't always right. Change needs to happen in footballThat's always been the norm though.
I was talking about it being the norm in rugby.The norm isn't always right. Change needs to happen in football
I know. Doesn't mean it can't change in footballI was talking about it being the norm in rugby.
It seems that even with their errors shown to them via var they still won’t change their minds in our caseOr maybe just don't contest the decision?
Apart from that time Craig Thomson cheated in the League Cup Final, has a referee ever changed their mind after a player shouted at them?