They all from Greenock?
You do know it’s impossible for 12 or more players to have started more than half the games?
I’d suspect if you looked around Europe it’d be similar numbers.
It’s not really but go ahead and show me your probability skills. I’m all ears. And I said half or more, not more, that’s an important distinction. Even looking at the Athletic list -
Sterling doesn’t start vs Celtic at Ibrox and we don’t go three at the back vs St Mirren - Yilmaz starts both of them , he’s nine
We don’t go three at the back vs Livingston and Barisic starts, he’s ten
McCausland takes four of Scott Wrights starts, eleven
Raskin takes seven of Lundstrams starts, twelve
Goldson gives up six starts to Balogun, thirteen
Etc, etc.
There are seven players with additional games that could go to players to bring them closer. There are also other players with less than half appearances that could give games to other players to get them there. The number of permutations is huge, even restricting by position.
The point of the original thread is the effect of injuries on the squad. It’s affected the managers stated opinion that we need to rotate the squad. We’ve given League starts to twenty eight players. I think with fewer injuries the rotation is in a smaller group of players and we have more capable players coming in. And we don’t break down some players by playing them every game.
