Media asking Robinson if Butland should have been sent off

Imagine asking if he should have been sent off. It was one of the worst refereeing decisions you’ll see anywhere on earth today by giving them a free kick for that and a fucking booking as well.

All this was after he wasn’t even giving anything for it at all, the wee prick.

Shouldn’t ever have been a booking nor a free kick but this is Scotland and this is how we do things here.
 
You’re also asking why the reporter is even posing the question.

It’s not a foul or a yellow card and that should really be the controversy you’re looking for, but instead, because it’s Rangers, just completely ignore what actually happened and go with the fake news version of events.
 
How many times does it need to be said? We should be calling out the rats in black at every time.

From getting a non existent free kick and handing out a ridiculous yellow, they're now painting it as we were lucky to finish with eleven men?

The Scottish press are anti Rangers filth and should be treated as such.
 
One of the strangest decisions I have seen this season. Butland cleared the ball long before the St Mirren player got there. Was always going to be a collision at that speed. Butland does not kick out etc. He just continues his normal trajectory after clearing the ball. Never a free kick. More a free kick to us.
 
Blue_Britain said:
Not long finished work. That's f*kin laughable. But even more so that the Scottish media are asking if it should be a red.
Click to expand...
The media on this occasion are right. The only decision it cannot be is a booking. Its either not a foul (it wasn't) or if the ref deems it a foul, it should be a red card for denying a goal scoring opportunity. If Butland is red carded VAR gets involved and overturns it. Walsh has made a cnut of himself here and Rangers should not let it go.
 
Last edited:
Shouldn’t have been a free kick or a yellow, but once he made that decision Butland should have been sent off. Utterly baffling decision on multiple fronts.
 
It's never a foul but for anyone to suggest it's a red card even after the foul is given is mental.

He boots the ball 70 yards away from goal before colliding with the.player so the suggestion that it somehow denied a goal scoring opportunity is crazy.
 
It's so pathetic, boring as well. All the football media is interested in is stoking up boring arguments by asking if a thing that didn't happen should have in fact happened, despite everyone knowing that the thing definitely shouldn't have happened.
 
Olusanya could see Butland going to play for the ball but kept running into him.

I don't think it was even accidently, his momentum didn't carry him into Butland, because he didn't even slow down when he could have slowed his run, he deliberately ran full pelt into Butland when he could see that he was going to play the ball.
 
Boldvale said:
The media on this occasion are right. The only decision it cannot be is a booking. Its either not a foul (it wasn't) or if the ref deems it a foul, it should be a red card for denying a goal scoring opportunity. If Butland is red carded and VAR gets involved and overturns it. Walsh has made a cnut of himself here and Rangers should not let it go.
Click to expand...
I see what you're saying but that's not right anyway. If you play the ball or a genuine attempt to play the ball then it's now a yellow for a goal scoring opportunity. Changed 2 or 3 years ago. Unless it's changed back again.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

Latest posts

Back
Top