Bluebluecee
Well-Known Member
A fukin total cop out by our board shitebags the lot of them locking out Rangers fans to accommodate the scum is another low from the knuts that are supposed to look after our club
I'm 119 120 and 121. Absolutely gutted only moved to BR4 to get seats with my kids not missed an Old firm game at Ibrox since 1991.124 and 125
You’re an embarrassmentWe’ve been bent over again. Decision made. Slippery slope till they get the full Broomloan no doubt.
Rodgers is already making noises today about a return to ‘how it used to be’.You’re an embarrassment
Surprised you manage to even leave the house in the morning with how paranoid you are
We will see mateRead the communication - not all affected supporters will be accommodated and will miss out
I’d love it if that happened, all these rockets bumping their gums about going to the knew camp would meltdown.It was only a matter of time before some form of agreement was in place for away fans for the fixture ongoing.
Totally agree that anyone missing out deserves the first refusal on tickets for the game at their place.
They’ll keep the one they have minus old firm ticketsThere are no guarantees every supporter will get a new seat.
Information is king here.
Celtic board never cared about that when they denied Rangers any allocation last time.I don’t think they really had a choice to be honest.
There’s an SPFL rule plus pressure from Sky made it inevitable it was going to need to change.
I think that's an excellent suggestion.Any bear who misses out at Ibrox for them should be guaranteed a piggery ticket, only fair. I am not affected by this.
And you’d be happy if that was the deal on YOUR season ticket?They’ll keep the one they have minus old firm tickets
Those affected aren’t even guaranteed another seat at Ibrox for the OF games, so I doubt if they will get a guaranteed ticket for the piggery.Any bear who misses out at Ibrox for them should be guaranteed a piggery ticket, only fair. I am not affected by this.
I'd say it's a combination of the league and sky wanting fans at the Grounds as much as anything there was always going to be a compromise we have prob went to far.Do you know the league stepped in?
We get far more than 5% at every away ground apart from the piggery (lately) and Tynecastle.So it's 5% at every away ground? No. It's nothing to do with SPFL
The problem will be with BR5 being the family section there will be high percentage of people wanting seats together. If we sell out season tickets like previous years there won't be thousands of seats together to move to. Unless there is a big drop in renewals I think a lot are going to be disappointed.We could at least guarantee the seat movers one old firm game each. There should be enough tickets in other areas to guarantee BR4 5 and BF4 and 5 one game each and then any left still goes to them but fastest finger first. I realise I'm screwed here as no way I'm getting three season tickets together in another area of the ground permanently but there must be something the club can do to get people like myself seats for at least one of the games.
I was just about going to do the same thing but thought that this would be the stock answer.Just had this ridiculous response back from Rangers so called Customer Service team when I suggested there would be a better option than 'first come first served'.
So much for the big investment in customer service and fan liason. They don't give a flying fxxx for the people that pour in money year after year.
Graeme xxxxx (Rangers FC)
29 Mar 2024, 16:12 GMT
Hi Iain
Thanks for the email.
We appreciate your feedback but unfortunately the club have made the decision on this and there will be no alterative options available.
Kind Regards
Graeme
They are if you are in CCCSThose games aren't included on the ST though.
Bisgrove againI think this is a massive own goal. Truly shocking the way the board has acted here. Liewell has had their pants down.
Going forward that isn't going to be the case. Hibs and Aberdeen cutting allocations.We get far more than 5% at every away ground apart from the piggery (lately) and Tynecastle.
I've also sent a note to SLO on Twitter suggesting this issue needed more engagement. It is not the same as the UB > Copland issue; but not far off it in terms of numbers affected I suspect. And that got a huge amount of consultation and dialogue.I was just about going to do the same thing but thought that this would be the stock answer.
Not everyone is CCCS, everyone that is a STH expect to see every home league gameThey are if you are in CCCS
Who in their right mind would want to be kettled in for two hours before a game sit in a restricted view seat then kept in the shittip for an hour after the game finishes because some scumbag has their seatI think that's an excellent suggestion.
Probably thousands going by the other thread.Who in their right mind would want to be kettled in for two hours before a game sit in a restricted view seat then kept in the shittip for an hour after the game finishes because some scumbag has their seat
It stands to reason that the two biggest clubs in the country have the biggest allocations at each other’s grounds.Will this lead to Aberdeen, Hibs and Hearts also requesting a 5% allocation, what is so different about Celtic ?
Once again we have backed down and been played like a fiddle.
Edit - Apparently derby games have different rulings.
I genuinely don't know what kind of projection of power you thought we were giving off when we cut the initial allocation because it just made us look like weak gimps to anyone on the outside looking in.Going forward that isn't going to be the case. Hibs and Aberdeen cutting allocations.
This is a huge misstep by the board.
From they won't get more than 800 to oh here's 3 times that amount and it will grow. Already you have Rodgers starting the narrative.
Bending over for folk that hate you...this board are the epitome of being cucks
It looks like they are being offered moves, how is that missing out?When the ones that wanted a Euro allocation said no season ticket holder would miss out why are season ticket holders missing out?
All the my Gers gold punters who think they are the only people who support the team personally I think they are as self entitled as the goon platoon from across the city the difference being them scum bastards would run rings round them as this allocation decision has provenProbably thousands going by the other thread.
There is no SPFL rulebook. If there were where was it when we went to the piggery?I genuinely don't know what kind of projection of power you thought we were giving off when we cut the initial allocation because it just made us look like weak gimps to anyone on the outside looking in.
Hibs, Aberdeen etc cutting our allocations to appease the nutters in their support is just as sad as our club appeasing our support when crying about them getting the Broomloan.
We could have at the time tried to negotiate a better allocation at the piggery on the basis that the percentage and placement was unfair but we went full nuclear and now the SPFL has stepped in with their rule book.
Everyone?It looks like they are being offered moves, how is that missing out?
Having copped a ban recently for allegedly voicing some strong opinions, I'm keeping my inner thoughts on this to myself Bud.All the my Gers gold punters who think they are the only people who support the team personally I think they are as self entitled as the goon platoon from across the city the difference being them scum bastards would run rings round them as this allocation decision has proven
I was happy the club took the decision they did to reduce the yahoo allocation to the corner same as every other away support in Scotland.I genuinely don't know what kind of projection of power you thought we were giving off when we cut the initial allocation because it just made us look like weak gimps to anyone on the outside looking in.
Hibs, Aberdeen etc cutting our allocations to appease the nutters in their support is just as sad as our club appeasing our support when crying about them getting the Broomloan.
We could have at the time tried to negotiate a better allocation at the piggery on the basis that the percentage and placement was unfair but we went full nuclear and now the SPFL has stepped in with their rule book.
Cccs only means that they take the payment automatically rather than having to manually buy the ticketsThey are if you are in CCCS
Seeing as we instigated the split to well below 5% to begin with I don't think we can shout J'accuse when Celtic binned it altogether.There is no SPFL rulebook. If there were where was it when we went to the piggery?
We bought ours in BF4 last season in Championship.Just my tuppence worth but when they had the full Broomloan stand, season Tkt’s were sold with the proviso that they did not include Celtic games but those season Tkt’s still sold out and I don’t remember any arguments. Probably find that will be the case when renewals come out for that stand.
Or am I wrong?????
Not taking sides here one way or another. Just sayin
Here's my issue. Why doesn't his happen at Ibrox. Home fans are inconvenienced by the mentally challenged barrier,the scum should be in well before the ko and kept in until Rangers fans disperse.Who in their right mind would want to be kettled in for two hours before a game sit in a restricted view seat then kept in the shittip for an hour after the game finishes because some scumbag has their seat
We offered 800, they refused them. They didn't even off mer us tickets. What did spfl do? Phuck all. Now because the scum want more we have this 5% rule from nowhere.Seeing as we instigated the split to well below 5% to begin with I don't think we can shout J'accuse when Celtic binned it altogether.
This is the compromise we are having to make due to our own actions.
I don’t think 5% was mentioned in the rules.Seeing as we instigated the split to well below 5% to begin with I don't think we can shout J'accuse when Celtic binned it altogether.
This is the compromise we are having to make due to our own actions.
Seemingly there's not enough spare seats to accommodate everyone but what I don't get is why is that the case when extra cantilever seating is being installed?It looks like they are being offered moves, how is that missing out?
It's a disgraceful decision,Those who received an email today to say there's a chance we might be locked out of future Old Firms will feel betrayed by the club.
We are just as loyal as any other season ticket holder. We pay our money the same as any other season ticket holder. We get behind the team the same as any other season ticket holder.
But today we have been let down by the board.
Not one Rangers supporter should be locked out of Ibrox to accommodate a tramp but today that's what we've been told.
Id like to think that if one single supporter misses out that the Rangers support as a whole would get behind them and voice their displeasure.
A lot won't show any sympathy as it doesn't affect them but a lot of good Bears have been let down today.
it isn't just them though is it. It's Sky and plenty of our own support too that want to see a return to a sizeable away support.We offered 800, they refused them. They didn't even off mer us tickets. What did spfl do? Phuck all. Now because the scum want more we have this 5% rule from nowhere.
Let's wait and see. BR is supposed to be the family stand and a lot of folk don't allow their kids to attend OF games so not everyone will want a move. Some might even welcome the reduction in ST costsSeemingly there's not enough spare seats to accommodate everyone but what I don't get is why is that the case when extra cantilever seating is being installed?
Unless they move the family section to BR1 to replace the Union BearsThe problem will be with BR5 being the family section there will be high percentage of people wanting seats together. If we sell out season tickets like previous years there won't be thousands of seats together to move to. Unless there is a big drop in renewals I think a lot are going to be disappointed.