Rob the Ranger
Well-Known Member
Where do you sit?Relocate them to the Albion car park
Where do you sit?Relocate them to the Albion car park
If it’s a small % of BF3 ST holders that are completely against the idea, with a sizeable majority happy to move to relocate I think the club will move all and deal with the backlash from a small %Just shift them the same way celtic did, 20% discount on a ST renewal elsewhere in the stadium to those effected.
Technically 20% would be GWC too. Sure this conversation cropped up in 201120% of the stadium's capacity would be the full Broomloan Stand which is the rule.
The rule may or may not still be 20% I don’t know but it doesn’t say “ the full stand”.20% of the stadium's capacity would be the full Broomloan Stand which is the rule.
East enclosureWhere do you sit?
I meant more for the people currently in the seats they want.Then they will have to lobby the club for a number of years and see what happens.
We would've gave them slightly less than the 20% due to segregation issues.Technically 20% would be GWC too. Sure this conversation cropped up in 2011
This is key mate. Given that they wave them at Hampden when behind the goals, I wouldn’t hold out much hope. Id be surprised if the threshold was met anyway personally.it's a good idea in principle but the majority of BF3 need to be happy to move which is no foregone conclusion they are being asked to move to a worse seat/position. The flags will also need to go for reasons mentioned already in the thread. I'm sure if the UB wants the move so badly they will be happy to give up the flags for the benefit of the rest of the stand.
They can still have flags/banners they’ll just need to be modified and of a different style. Also some placed down the front behind goal.it's a good idea in principle but the majority of BF3 need to be happy to move which is no foregone conclusion they are being asked to move to a worse seat/position. The flags will also need to go for reasons mentioned already in the thread. I'm sure if the UB wants the move so badly they will be happy to give up the flags for the benefit of the rest of the stand.
That's the easy answer when you've fucked upLot of people getting a complete sarcasm wooofftt!
Without them Ibrox would be like a library most gamesRelocate them to the Albion car park
Disgrace of a commentRelocate them to the Albion car park
Also frees up seats as you only need empty seats on 1 side of the away fans, rather than currently on both sides.Why not just swap places with the visiting fans.
Christ man calm down.The rule may or may not still be 20% I don’t know but it doesn’t say “ the full stand”.
If we are drawn at the piggery , 20% would be 12,000, you see them giving us that?
I’ve not fucked upThat's the easy answer when you've fucked up
I agree, but people need to see they are not all good as well and shouldn’t get preferential treatment.Without them Ibrox would be like a library most games
Not really, it was sarcasm.Disgrace of a comment
I was thinking about thisI’m BF3 and will happily stay there in the singing section with my boy
Why post on the thread then.I’ve not fucked up
I’ve been very vocal about how the UB are no different to any other fan but we need them when they aren’t being wee dicks.
I honestly couldn’t care where they are.
disgrace you havent been relocated to roundabout at cardonaldDisgrace of a comment
Not so much the seat issue but a rapport would have been built up with those around them and would be a big miss for some in the Copland Front.Amazed amount saying a seat is a seat. Some have had their seat in the family for generations. Not saying that will be the case in BF just surprised people think moving those against their will is acceptable.
It’s a fans forum.Why post on the thread then.
If your forced out a rental against your will would you rent from the same people again?It’s not their seat though is it you’re renting it for the duration of the season.
If you rent a house and suddenly a nightclub opens next door which you don’t like…it’s your decision to stay or go.
I agree with you.Christ man calm down.
It's easier to describe it as the full stand as that is what it has/would be going by the rules.
They would give us the old allocation in my opinion barring any "security issues" that may crop up.
For what it's worth I cant see us agreeing to giving them the Broomloan ever again and I suspect the same goes for them.
I would argue that the seats in BF3 Rows A-J are a worse view than seats in the same rows in BF1it's a good idea in principle but the majority of BF3 need to be happy to move which is no foregone conclusion they are being asked to move to a worse seat/position. The flags will also need to go for reasons mentioned already in the thread. I'm sure if the UB wants the move so badly they will be happy to give up the flags for the benefit of the rest of the stand.
Easy tigerdisgrace you havent been relocated to roundabout at cardonald
Of course, I’d take up one of their options in a quieter area if I didn’t like it.If your forced out a rental against your will would you rent from the same people again?
I would argue that the seats in BF3 Rows A-J are a worse view than seats in the same rows in BF1
On your flag point, they wouldn’t agree to not waving flags so that won’t be part of an agreement. That’s why I could foresee the club implementing a trial period until the end of the season and then if it doesn’t work, revert back to the current status quo
They’d argue flags are imperative to the visual aspect of the section. Flags are present at away, European away and hampden games at present where other fans views get obscuredwhy wouldn't they agree to not waving flags or at the very least not waving flags that obstruct fellow supporters view?
shame if that's the case, it's the family stand and the feedback seems to be young family members can't see the game. Surely non-obtrusive different flags would be an option? sadly I don't see this going smoothly at all.They’d argue flags are imperative to the visual aspect of the section. Flags are present at away, European away and hampden games at present where other fans views get obscured
Just don’t think they’d ever agree to it if that’s a condition of the move. The discussion that would follow would be a different discussion all together but I don’t think for one minute they’ll agree to that
There are various alternatives. Smaller flags, all down the front, banners rather than flags, the twirling of scarves, certain agreed points.shame if that's the case, it's the family stand and the feedback seems to be young family members can't see the game. Surely non-obtrusive different flags would be an option? sadly I don't see this going smoothly at all.
Good shout.Is the AGM coming up? new manager & moving the Union Bears before it, is there serious questions to be asked?
I think it would raise a different discussion all together on the practicalities of it which would hopefully be resolvedshame if that's the case, it's the family stand and the feedback seems to be young family members can't see the game. Surely non-obtrusive different flags would be an option? sadly I don't see this going smoothly at all.
This is big reason why many will vote no then mate. There would have to be a common ground, it cant be one group of supporters making demands of other supporters, who pay the same, without being willing to compromise. No fan is more important than any other.I would argue that the seats in BF3 Rows A-J are a worse view than seats in the same rows in BF1
On your flag point, they wouldn’t agree to not waving flags so that won’t be part of an agreement. That’s why I could foresee the club implementing a trial period until the end of the season and then if it doesn’t work, revert back to the current status quo
You said move them to the car park then called them “wee dicks”It’s a fans forum.
It’s never sunshine and rainbows.
Opinions and discussions are or should be welcomed.
Ive said no mate. As has everyone i know that sits near me.No one should be saying no to that
As said, there’ll be a few implications that would raise a totally different discussion. Someone like me wouldn’t want in caned due to flags, although they can be a pain in the arse, where as for others that’s a deal breakerThis is big reason why many will vote no then mate. There would have to be a common ground, it cant be one group of supporters making demands of other supporters, who pay the same, without being willing to compromise. No fan is more important than any other.
For me it's for the greater good so they can get shifted if they like it or not.it's a good idea in principle but the majority of BF3 need to be happy to move which is no foregone conclusion they are being asked to move to a worse seat/position. The flags will also need to go for reasons mentioned already in the thread. I'm sure if the UB wants the move so badly they will be happy to give up the flags for the benefit of the rest of the stand.
What the UBs want, the UBs get. Or the atmosphere suffers etc.
Top opinionYou said move them to the car park then called them “wee dicks”
Top discussion.