Is there not some stupid double punishment thing?Just back from the game watching it back and they are saying it was a harsh red card he stopped the ball on the line its the reddist of reds
They are all a bunch of fannies.
That's for a tackle on a player in the box, not stopping the ball on the line.Is there not some stupid double punishment thing?
No one contested itThe laws of the game state it’s a red card. No idea why they bleat on it was harsh. Only contested as its Rangers who got the decision. Any other game on tv it’s discussed and said correct call.
Is there not some stupid double punishment thing?
Biggest Fanny of them all at that momentThey are all a bunch of fannies.
Too late, I decided to be raging as soon as I opened the thread.Every one of the Sky pundits said the law is harsh, but it is the law so a definite red.
Sorry but nothing to get ragin about here.
Miller's the pricks prick.Miller went on and on and on about it
What's this?Alfredo Morelos. All we need to say.
Just thinking that. Just home and watched it there and they all said thats the rules so its a red.Every one of the Sky pundits said the law is harsh, but it is the law so a definite red.
Sorry but nothing to get ragin about here.
Thank fu*k I get it for fu*k allFuk sky
If a genuine attempt to play the ball there is no double punishment.That's for a tackle on a player in the box, not stopping the ball on the line.
It was harsh but it’s the rules.Just back from the game watching it back and they are saying it was a harsh red card he stopped the ball on the line its the reddist of reds
Which it wasn’t he played the manIf a genuine attempt to play the ball there is no double punishment.
Nope, the Rangers haters will pretend there is but by the letter of the law the decision was 100% correct. Much like the penalty at Love Street earlier in the season
When it happened the ref was unaware of the potential offside.Red card all day, every day.
Again, we needed VAR to make the decision because the ref gave offside initially
We need a sports TV channel in this country that just want to report on football or other sport according to the laws of the game.The laws of the game state it’s a red card. No idea why they bleat on it was harsh. Only contested as its Rangers who got the decision. Any other game on tv it’s discussed and said correct call.
When it happened the ref was unaware of the potential offside.
He was looking right at it and did not give a pen.
The linesman then put his flag up at which point the offside would have been reviewed.
Both the ref and the linesman got it wrong. For reasons unknown.....
Why would he say any different to Sutton, McFadden or Boyd?We will wait and see what Brother Dermott Gallagher has to say about it tomorrow.
his word counts.
What was said about the incident that you object to?We need a sports TV channel in this country that just want to report on football or other sport according to the laws of the game.
Not one that courts controversy on every decision that is 100% correct every single time, just because it involves Rangers.
It's tragic and sad
Who is actually asking for this childish level of sports journalism. Is creating social media clicks really more important than creating a professional product.
Nobody wants this. Its embarrassing. Aren't the people involved in Sky TV, BBC etc embarrassed by what they put out
Who else goes to work thinking a plan to fo a terrible job today with what I produce with the express intent of creating social media interaction
It's f'n terrible
It's the influence of reality TV etc on sports media
Why can't we have an "the athletic" level of broadcast media
Surely any such channel would pis all over sky, BBC etc
Why is no one involved in Scottish football interested in creating a high quality product?
When will someone realise they have jumped the shark with this nonsense
The guy has unintentionally but 100% absolutely slapped the ball off the line
Why would he say any different to Sutton, McFadden or Boyd?
No point for debate surely?
Is Miller thick?he aknowledged it was within the rules but then questioned the rules,he's starting to do my head in with his supposed impartiality.and that fukn accent.Miller went on and on and on about it
Just back from the game watching it back and they are saying it was a harsh red card he stopped the ball on the line its the reddist of reds
As I say, everyone says correct decision, so nothing to debateI watch RTV, no idea what they said.
As I say, everyone says correct decision, so nothing to debate
He also thought it was a foul in the build up to the second. Then again so did that rational and insightful Dick Gordon on the radio after.Miller's the pricks prick.
Every one of the Sky pundits said the law is harsh, but it is the law so a definite red.
Sorry but nothing to get ragin about here.
No one contested it
You two are sadToo late, I decided to be raging as soon as I opened the thread.