Twosignals
Well-Known Member
That’s normal, they make sure they’ll never be tossed out. No wonder the Club want nothing to do with them.I’m a contributor but didn’t know anything about any meeting.
That’s normal, they make sure they’ll never be tossed out. No wonder the Club want nothing to do with them.I’m a contributor but didn’t know anything about any meeting.
What relevance does the NDA have to the Castore arrangement?
1.43 into the video of part 1.
what is a red heron?This board promised transparency.have we had that I'm not so sure
Who has Dave King character assassined?
The bailing out is a red heron as they were paid in shares or loans
clue or piece of information that is, or is intended to be, misleading or distracting.what is a red heron?
As club1872 are a large shareholder, shouldn't they be allowed to know the details of contractsSo Rev McQuarrie outed the board of C1872 for going behind the Rangers board back and contacting Castore directly regarding matters of contracts, despite it being an off the record and not to be mentioned conversation and Rangers want NDA’s signed so that information can’t be discussed again.
There was a massive thread by Suck regard the Rev’s concerns and fears about C1872.
Edit: I’ve found the thread link below.
The Rangers Chaplain, Reverend Stuart MacQuarrie - expelled from Club 1872
The club Chaplain, Rev Stuart MacQuarrie, also a former director of Club 1872, received a 6 page document expelling him on Friday at 5.00 pm. No prior notification was received from the Board of Club 1872 that this matter was under consideration The expulsion letter mostly relates to Club...www.followfollow.com
Not necessarily would be my answer.As club1872 are a large shareholder, shouldn't they be allowed to know the details of contracts
NDA's signed so a body set up to hold all Rangers board of directors to account are never allowed to hold those board of directors to account, no thanks.So Rev McQuarrie outed the board of C1872 for going behind the Rangers board back and contacting Castore directly regarding matters of contracts, despite it being an off the record and not to be mentioned conversation and Rangers want NDA’s signed so that information can’t be discussed again.
There was a massive thread by Suck regard the Rev’s concerns and fears about C1872.
Edit: I’ve found the thread link below.
The Rangers Chaplain, Reverend Stuart MacQuarrie - expelled from Club 1872
The club Chaplain, Rev Stuart MacQuarrie, also a former director of Club 1872, received a 6 page document expelling him on Friday at 5.00 pm. No prior notification was received from the Board of Club 1872 that this matter was under consideration The expulsion letter mostly relates to Club...www.followfollow.com
The reason to still contribute is that you can still vote. The people in charge ,if they have Rangers at heart , should organise new elections,stand down themselves and let new blood in. They have failed and it is really time for a change.I have put thousands of pounds, like thousands of other people, into C1872 but no longer contribute so no longer a member.
The whole C1872 set up is wrong and needs overhauled and a new board elected.
Why would anyone still be contributing?
C1872 in its current form is an example of how not to do things.
Having been, in the past, a strong supporter of C1872, I am now firmly in the ‘needs to reform’ camp. This is a very sad state of affairs.
The problem seems to be that the current C1872 have a legally watertight, self elected board and hence the perpetuity of its existence.
What can be done?
I wouldn't have thought so. That's info for the Board Members. They hold circa 5% of shares. A business couldn't operate effectively if everything they did had to be circulated to those with over 5% of the shares, for example.As club1872 are a large shareholder, shouldn't they be allowed to know the details of contracts
Could they not do that privately? Like fellow directors do to each other if they are subject to an NDA? Because what you are presumably suggesting is releasing commercially sensitive info to all C1872 members (and therefore the world)?NDA's signed so a body set up to hold all Rangers board of directors to account are never allowed to hold those board of directors to account, no thanks.
Probably because it’s there funds at stakeNot necessarily would be my answer.
If a shareholder isn't on the board or an active in decision making like that, why would they?!
Andy McGowan is it not - good manThe person speaking, I believe, is on H&H a lot. Can't remember his name.
C1872 is a fans organisation thoughCould they not do that privately? Like fellow directors do to each other if they are subject to an NDA? Because what you are presumably suggesting is releasing commercially sensitive info to all C1872 members (and therefore the world)?
Sounds like Andy McGowan. He's always good on H&HThe person speaking, I believe, is on H&H a lot. Can't remember his name.
But the board represent the fans in things like this?C1872 is a fans organisation though
As I said they promised transparencyBut the board represent the fans in things like this?
Can you remind me when this was promised because I must have missed it. 2015 was the last time I heard promises being made.As I said they promised transparency
It's been far from it Sydney Cup,Castore deal, sports direct court case,memorial court case
I’m not sure our fanbase can have a supporters group without it ending up with the same issues as club1872 has. Everyone will say it won’t end up a vanity project or blazer chasers but every single group ends up that way because it’s human nature to want power, influence etc . If a new one was stated tomorrow a year or 2 down the line the same thing would occur . I don’t know if a functioning fan group is actual a realityClub1872 will never be a success whilst the current board members are involved and their egos are preventing it from being the fan vehicle it could be
Its a wee vanity project for a small group of 4 or 5 that are chasing their dream of a seat in the directors box at Ibrox, and they’re making decisions to improve their own position rather than for the greater good of Club1872
I will never donate 1 more penny into it until those board members are gone, particularly Laura and Claire
It was made when we ousted the spivsCan you remind me when this was promised because I must have missed it. 2015 was the last time I heard promises being made.
And do what with the shares they hold? Not quite as simple. Certainly needs a root and branch reform and new personalities at the helm. As stated in the videos, they've become inextricably linked to King, who has his own issues with the Club Board. Will never succeed whilst at odds with the Club and that won't come without movement on their part.
What we got here is failure to attendicate.From this clip some guy says there were only 7 people in attendance?!
Also as a lapsed contributor I agree with his points, something needs to change.
Part 1
Part 2
See these Blazer chasers? How many actually got tailored up?What a shambles Club 1872 became. Filled at the top level by self-serving blazer chasers who allowed themselves to be bought and paid for.
No wonder the wider Rangers support can’t place any trust in them.
Needs a full clearout and a fresh start.
See these Blazer chasers? How many actually got tailored up?
I don't think there's been one.
Maybe if they didn't expel professionals that were willing to help in the short term, sort it out, and have free elections where no one was barred from standing it might help, then making up lies to try and get one of them jailed and we come to the disgusting way they treated a well respectedHow can we change things at board level when no one is willing to put themselves forward for election anymore? Look at the stick everyone involved has got since Stewart Robertson and his puppets tried to make a change. Who'd want to volunteer for that shit.
Elections the proper way should have been the correct course of action, always.
I've never met Chris Graham. If he thinks, or thought he should be a decision maker, then that's on him. I couldn't say.Chris Graham who funnily enough is at C1872 and Craig Houston thought his was more of a high viz than blazer.
It's called Commercial Credibility, without it, we would get very very few dealsNDA's signed so a body set up to hold all Rangers board of directors to account are never allowed to hold those board of directors to account, no thanks.
I’m a contributor but didn’t know anything about any meeting.
What outsiders that American womenIt's called Commercial Credibility, without it, we would get very very few deals
Why don't they tell us why DK can offer deals to outsiders on behalf of C1872?
That was tried, they phoned the PolisTbh Andy did well considering it’s old ground that he is again going over with the same people that are dragging the organisation into the ground with their ego and blazer chasing ambition.
Everyone in charge of the organisation needs to leave, a temporary board has to be put in charge until a new voted and fit for purpose board is created.
Didn't you call a egm and it failedThat was tried, they phoned the Polis
Sell the shares and make a large donation to the club with terms that it must be used for future transfer fees.
No offered our group 2 places on the C1872 Board and said he would get the 2 females to resign by Christmas. Refusing me a meeting with Laura as she wasWhat outsiders that American women
One eatswhat is a red heron?
Bang on. Me too.I have put thousands of pounds, like thousands of other people, into C1872 but no longer contribute so no longer a member.
The whole C1872 set up is wrong and needs overhauled and a new board elected.
Why would anyone still be contributing?
C1872 in its current form is an example of how not to do things.
Having been, in the past, a strong supporter of C1872, I am now firmly in the ‘needs to reform’ camp. This is a very sad state of affairs.
The problem seems to be that the current C1872 have a legally watertight, self elected board and hence the perpetuity of its existence.
What can be done?
Quite the opposite, we got nearly 300 members to agree with us, then they threw us out and made an official complaint to PS about meDidn't you call a egm and it failed
That was tried, they phoned the Polis
I think you might’ve mixed up your birds and your fish!! !This board promised transparency.have we had that I'm not so sure
Who has Dave King character assassined?
The bailing out is a red heron as they were paid in shares or loans
It must be said that the reaction was pitiful to say the least!!!That was tried, they phoned the Polis
None of us wanted to be involved, the four guys would have been perfect, and my role would have been to be a non-voting chairman while they sorted all the legalities out ( I know my limits )To be fair mate I think it needs someone totally fresh and with a clean slate if they change things and I'm not sure that's you.
I hope you don't take that personally as I'm sure you had best intentions. For context I'm a subscriber to H&H and love Davie Edgar but I'd say the same about him being involved as well.