nae rules in rule book sums up the continuous incompetence of uneducated corrupt mentally challenged bastrds running n the league n SFA
It's not "Health and Safety" it's "Safety and Matchday Experience Issues" and it was "serious". Were some of them offered chicken suppers at the kiosks ?The filths statement is full of holes that Rangers should be battering through....If health and safety is an issue it would still be an issue for any away fan group.
How many Hearts fans were there on Saturday ?
RANGERS, DO NOT LET THIS GO!
The SPFL could make one up, there has been previous.nae rules in rule book sums up the continuous incompetence of uneducated corrupt mentally challenged bastrds running n the league n SFA
In a word "LAWWELL"What's the point of the SPFL having rules and committees when they just let Celtic break those rules whenever they want.
I also think this is what will happen.This is a dance. They want 2500. We will get 3k. The 5%. Anyone thinking that this wasn't the end game isn't watching or listening. Both clubs will agree to this amount. Personally, I don't want them anywhere near Ibrox.
Still the same point,they've got to be asked with regards Matchday Experience,how can it effect the game on the 30th but not any other game?It's not "Health and Safety" it's "Safety and Matchday Experience Issues" and it was "serious". Were some of them offered chicken suppers at the kiosks ?
If things continue the way they ae going, he might be safer in with the 800 bears than the Mars Bar chuckers in the falling down stand.In a word "LAWWELL"
compromise with rhats. They don't do compromise, it's my way or the highway with the beasts.And that’s why we should be taking advantage of a % based rule. We would end up with more fans. Or compromise on our position within the stand. Compromising in our favour is better than this utter shitshow regardless of your views on how many fans should be there.
No restricted views in the Broomloan, these basturts started it.I can respect all the different opinions either side of the ticket argument, to me there are valid points on either side.
But these scumbags started it, it was never right back to 1995 when we just got the corner & a bit at the Crime Scene, while they got the whole Broomloan. Totally disproportionate.
Mate, if we go 1 seat over what we offered before, we lose. It's not going to happen. Celtic stamp their feet, break the rules and we bend over?This is a dance. They want 2500. We will get 3k. The 5%. Anyone thinking that this wasn't the end game isn't watching or listening. Both clubs will agree to this amount. Personally, I don't want them anywhere near Ibrox.
Don’t you think we should never have taken this to the league to rule over? If we back them into a corner they might say “ok, 10% seems like a reasonable figure” and then we are back to giving them the Broomloan (that is assuming you don’t want them to get the full Broomloan).The filth are trying to force a ruling here that will see them get the 10% of away briefs behind the goal.
They are being obviously petulant
Im with you on this thats it now for me,give them nothing we want nothing in return the end of the matter.Rangers have the chance to put the full thing to bed once and for all now. Since they’ve decided that they no longer wish for away fans to attend these fixtures then we won’t be offering them any tickets going forward. Kills the full thing stone dead and we can all get on with life.
They couldn’t afford to turn down the blue pound.Feel sorry for the club here, they tried to open the rest of Scottish footballs eyes to the utter ineptitude of those running the game up here by essentially pointing out that the game is ran defacto by C****c but they were more consumed by their disdain for Rangers than they were about doing the right thing.
It then leads to crap like this were that lot can openly contravene the rules knowing fine well f-all will get done about it.
Lets hope this doesn't set a precedent for other bitter clubs to just pull out allocations on a whim. Imagine post split if we had an opportunity to go to Pittodrie or Easter Road to secure the title and they pull our allocation on 'safety' grounds. Can anyone here honestly say they couldn't see this happening now.
We should offer them 8000 then tell them I’d was a typo that should’ve read 80I would keep offering them the reasonable amount of 800 and let them keep knocking it back. Show them up as the childish cretins they are.
And Matchday Experience Issues ?Anyone aware of the safety concerns they have ?
This is a dance. They want 2500. We will get 3k. The 5%. Anyone thinking that this wasn't the end game isn't watching or listening. Both clubs will agree to this amount. Personally, I don't want them anywhere near Ibrox.
The ones shouting about the European allocations in response to this are missing the point as usual - that doesn’t address the fact they’ll have Rangers fans all around them (compared to the safety of the whole broomloan) and still makes a mockery of their faux safety manufactured outrage that you’re all falling for
I don’t believe the Tim’s are remotely interested in any European allocation compromise and anyone who thinks they are are either naive or haven’t been paying attention.
There is a reason they are desperate for the old arrangements. It was skewed in their favour.
Wanting to have a larger % of the away fans follow Rangers in comparison to the home fans isn’t selfish. Really strange take.That is quite simply never going to happen.
I know people are desperate to get the allocations back but start paying attention.
Rangers won't get a single advantage or favour from anyone in Scottish football. The only "compromise" they want is the old allocations back and it saddens me to see Rangers supporters wanting to cave to them for fairly selfish reasons.
Today’s decision was always likely because of the wording of the rule. It said ‘reasonable’.Legal? Rules? Ah, you mean like today’s decision…
It’s laughable that people still believe in the authorities to govern properly and for Celtic to behave in manner that benefits anyone but themselves.
It’s also odd how welcome others are to believe the above in order to justify their ticket to Parkhead.
If it’s a % based rule they have no choice but to. Similarly if we drafted up a binding contract in regard to positioning (not that this annoys me as much).compromise with rhats. They don't do compromise, it's my way or the highway with the beasts.
If it’s a % based rule they have no choice but to. Similarly if we drafted up a binding contract in regard to positioning (not that this annoys me as much).
Having a look on their forum, they are mentioning their physio being hit with a bottle and bottles thrown to the pitch. Both issues that should result in the fans responsible being hammered. I also seem to remember that mob thowing fireworks into our section resulting in a wee boy suffering temp deafness. I'm also sure bottles were thrown. Didn't they have serious safety issues at their dump when we were there, crushing of their own fans with folk jumping into the graveyard next door?Anyone aware of the safety concerns they have ?
If it’s a % based rule they have no choice but to. Similarly if we drafted up a binding contract in regard to positioning (not that this annoys me as much).
I’m looking forward to Super Phil strutting about that technical line, as though he is ready to place someone into a figure four leg lock.So 60000 scum get to watch Super Phil's quadruple chasing Gers, put them to the sword. Be fooking sweet.
There isn’t any. Simple as that. It’s a game they are playing to ensure that they get the safety and security, and the one up on us of course, of the full Broomloan Stand.Anyone aware of the safety concerns they have ?
If they ever get in again, leave them in the corner with a Santa hat each on the seats.For me it’s very simple; they must never be given the full Broomloan and shouldn’t be seen by the tv cameras. If there is an agreed %, then house them in part of the west enclosure.
You can’t ignore something that is objective.You should know as well as I do that even if the SPFL introduced a % the Tim’s will simply ignore it and give us the same number of tickets as they get at Ibrox (and thus a smaller % of capacity).
They’ll hide behind safety and segregation concerns. Have puppets at the council back their position and the SPFL will do %^*& all.
We should all be used to how these scum bags operate by now.
They technically haven’t broken any rules per se. See above. They will argue the safety concerns bullshit was their reason for not offering a ‘reasonable’ amount as per the wording of the rule.There doesn’t appear to any consequences for breaking these ticketing rules though so I’d fully expect rangers to give them nothing, like they’re doing here
The smelly bas£ards are coming nowhere near us in the WE.For me it’s very simple; they must never be given the full Broomloan and shouldn’t be seen by the tv cameras. If there is an agreed %, then house them in part of the west enclosure.
You gonnae give a Bear who has a ticket for the Broomloan your ticket thenBoth clubs need to get together and try and sort it out , no away fans takes away from the occasion and atmosphere , simple solution give rangers full stand behind the goal at celtic park & celtic get broomloan
Both clubs need to get together and try and sort it out , no away fans takes away from the occasion and atmosphere , simple solution give rangers full stand behind the goal at celtic park & celtic get broomloan
Both clubs need to get together and try and sort it out , no away fans takes away from the occasion and atmosphere , simple solution give rangers full stand behind the goal at celtic park & celtic get broomloan